소요의 철학 아카이브

Kutz (2000) Complicity (6) Problematic Accountability: Facilitation, Unstructured Collective Harm, and Organizational Dysfunction

Kutz, Christopher (2000). Complicity: Ethics and Law for a Collective Age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kutz (2000) Complicity (5) Complicitous Accountability

Kutz, Christopher (2000). Complicity: Ethics and Law for a Collective Age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kutz (2000) Complicity (4) Moral Accountability and Collective Action

Kutz, Christopher (2000). Complicity: Ethics and Law for a Collective Age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 4.1 IntroductionWe turn now to the central issue: individual moral accountability in the context of collective action. The most important and far-reaching harms and wrongs of contemporary life are the products of collective actions, mediated by social and institutional structures. Th..

Kutz, Christopher (2000). Complicity: Ethics and Law for a Collective Age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 3.1 IntroductionTwo partners plan to rob a bank. The first recruits a driver while the second purchases a shotgun from a gun dealer. The driver knows he's taking part in a robbery, although not a bank robbery. The gun dealer should have checked his customer's police record before th..

Kutz, Christopher (2000). Complicity: Ethics and Law for a Collective Age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2.1 IntroductionMy aim in this chapter is to define a conception of individual ac countability for individual harms that overcomes the limitations of the individualistic conception I discussed in Chapter 1, particularly the way it excluded the significance of the accountable subject'..

Kutz, Christopher (2000). Complicity: Ethics and Law for a Collective Age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.1.1We find ourselves connected to harms and wrongs, albeit by relations that fall outside the paradigm of individual, intentional wrongdoing.1. Buying a table made of tropical wood that comes from a defoliated rain forest2. Owning stock in a company that does business in a country tha..

Organizational Complicity. Rwandan Refugee Camps 1. The Overview of Chapter 7Based on the theoretical frameworks presented in Chapters 4 through 6, Lepora and Goodin analyze the case of the Rwandan refugee camps to evaluate the blameworthiness of various agents involved in the specific wrongdoing—“using the refugees as human shields to protect perpetrators of genocide” (138). As they earlier not..

Chiara Lepora and Robert Goodin. On Complicity and Compromise (2013) Organizational Complicity Rwandan Refugee CampsIn any complex case of grievous wrongdoing, the wrongdoers usually have some help. Other people instigate and encourage, aid and abet, facilitate, permit, or overlook the wrongdoing. By contributing in such ways, people can become complicit in that wrongdoing.The first thing to say..

Chiara Lepora and Robert Goodin. On Complicity and Compromise (2013)Assessing Acts of Complicity A General FrameworkHow morally blameworthy an act of complicity is is a function of four things:the moral badness of the principal wrongdoing;whether (and, insofar as it is scalar, by how much) the secondary agent crosses the threshold of moral responsibility for having contributed to it;how much of ..

Chiara Lepora and Robert Goodin. On Complicity and Compromise (2013) Responsibility for Complicity A Minimum Threshold Wrongdoing, whether by doing wrong yourself or by contributing to the wrong done by others, must always involve a certain sort of act together with a certain sort of mental state. The issue that lies at the heart of this chapter is precisely which sort.The ‘intention’ side: you..