Analytic 54

Reconciling Bartky’s feminist consciousness and the Marxist notion of contradictions

2024-2 Feminist Ethics Reconciling Bartky’s feminist consciousness and the Marxist notion of contradictions In her article, “Toward a Phenomenology of Feminist Consciousness,” Bartky offers a fascinating picture that combines Marxist analysis―i.e., their theory of contradictions―with feminist consciousness―i.e., an anguished consciousness characterizes human subjectivity in periods of social cha..

Analytic/Ethics 2024.09.10

Bettcher (2014) Trapped in the Wrong Theory: Rethinking Trans Oppression and Resistance

2024-2 Feminist Ethics Bettcher, T. M. (2014). Trapped in the Wrong Theory: Rethinking Trans Oppression and Resistance. Signs, 39(2), 383–406.   1. The "wrong-body" model, the psychological variant of the model, and  a “beyond the binary” model The wrong-body modelThe psychological variant of the modelTranssexuality involves a misalignment between gender identity and the sexed body. This idea de..

Analytic/Ethics 2024.09.04

Crenshaw (1989) Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics

2024-2 Feminist Ethics Crenshaw, Kimberlé (1989). Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics. The University of Chicago Legal Forum 140:139-167. One of the very few Black women's studies books is entitled All the Women Are White; All the Blacks Are Men, But Some of Us are Brave. I have chosen..

Analytic/Ethics 2024.09.02

Landini (2012) Frege’s Notations What They Are and How They Mean (1)

Landini, Gregory (2012). Frege's Notations: What They Are and How They Mean. London and Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan. [1-14]  ※ Author’s Note on the Use of Modern Logical NotationsThe book endeavors to explain Frege’s notations in terms of modern nota tions. It is therefore worth making a few comments on the modern nota tions used in the book that might not be familiar to readers. In addition..

『논리-철학 논고』의 말할 수 있는 것

1 비트겐슈타인의 에서 중요한 것은 “말할 수 없는 것”이다. 여기에서 말하는 중요성이란 두 가지 의미를 지니고 있다: 한편으로, 논고의 가치론의 측면에서 말할 수 없는 것은 말할 수 있는 것보다 더할 나위없이 중요하다(가치 있다). 다른 한편으로, 논고에서 규명하려 하는 중심 질문은 “말할 수 있는 것이 어떻게 가능한가?”이며, 이런 의미에서 논고는 말할 수 없는 것, 즉 뜻을 결여한(sinnlos) 명제와 무의미한(unsinnig) 명제의 근본 성격을 규명하는 일에 많은 지면을 할애하고 있다. 따라서 우리는 그 비중의 측면에서도 말할 수 없는 것이 말할 수 있는 것보다 논고 안에서 더 중요하게 다루어진다고 파악해볼 수 있다. 2 반면 말할 수 있는 것에 관해서는, 우리는 이것에 대해 대개 더 구체적인..