소요의 철학 아카이브

2025-1 Descartes

2025-1 Seminar Ethics

Organizational Complicity. Rwandan Refugee Camps 1. The Overview of Chapter 7Based on the theoretical frameworks presented in Chapters 4 through 6, Lepora and Goodin analyze the case of the Rwandan refugee camps to evaluate the blameworthiness of various agents involved in the specific wrongdoing—“using the refugees as human shields to protect perpetrators of genocide” (138). As they earlier not..

2025-1 Seminar Ethics

Chiara Lepora and Robert Goodin. On Complicity and Compromise (2013) Organizational Complicity Rwandan Refugee CampsIn any complex case of grievous wrongdoing, the wrongdoers usually have some help. Other people instigate and encourage, aid and abet, facilitate, permit, or overlook the wrongdoing. By contributing in such ways, people can become complicit in that wrongdoing.The first thing to say..

Chiara Lepora and Robert Goodin. On Complicity and Compromise (2013)Assessing Acts of Complicity A General FrameworkHow morally blameworthy an act of complicity is is a function of four things:the moral badness of the principal wrongdoing;whether (and, insofar as it is scalar, by how much) the secondary agent crosses the threshold of moral responsibility for having contributed to it;how much of ..

Chiara Lepora and Robert Goodin. On Complicity and Compromise (2013) Responsibility for Complicity A Minimum Threshold Wrongdoing, whether by doing wrong yourself or by contributing to the wrong done by others, must always involve a certain sort of act together with a certain sort of mental state. The issue that lies at the heart of this chapter is precisely which sort.The ‘intention’ side: you..

Chiara Lepora and Robert Goodin. On Complicity and Compromise (2013) Grading Engagement with Wrongdoing Dimensions of DifferenceOne pertains to the role the agent plays in doing or contributing to the doing of the wrong—the way in which her acts contribute to or partially constitute the wrong. The other basic dimension pertains to the mental stance the agent takes towards the principal wrongdoin..

Chiara Lepora and Robert Goodin. On Complicity and Compromise (2013) Complicity and its Conceptual Cousins Among the distinct practices that we separate out for special attention are ‘connivance’, ‘contiguity’, ‘collusion’, ‘collaboration’, ‘condoning’, ‘consorting’ ‘conspiring’ and ‘full joint wrongdoing’. After having separated out all of those conceptual cousins, we will be left with a slight..