소요의 철학 아카이브

Collins (2023) Organizations as Wrongdoers. From Ontology to Morality Ch. 4

Collins, Stephanie (2023). Organizations as Wrongdoers. From Ontology to Morality. Oxford: Oxford University. Varieties of Organizational Blameworthiness4.1 IntroductionThis book is titled Organizations as Wrongdoers. So far, I’ve said a lot about organizations, but not much about wrongdoing. The rest of the book changes that.The present chapter defends organizations’ blameworthiness through thr..

Collins (2023) on Collective Guilt Feeling

Stephanie Collins. Organizations as Wrongdoers (2023)And what about feelings of guilt, remorse, and shame—can organ izations experience these feelings in a phenomenological sense (not just their ‘functional equivalents’)—and why does this matter for organizations’ blameworthiness? [3] In Part II (Chapters 4 and 5), I demonstrate that this metaphysical thesis yields important moral conclusions: o..

Konzelmann Ziv (2007) Collective Guilt Feeling Revisited

Konzelmann Ziv, Anita (2007). Collective Guilt Feeling Revisited. Dialectica, 61 (3): 467-493. Introduction While collective guilt understood as collective responsibility is a common subject in political theory, theory of law and social psychology, the problem of collective guilt feeling has not found wide attention until recently. As the term ‘guilt’ is ambiguous, denoting both factual guilt (b..

Collins, Stephanie (2018). The Government Should Be Ashamed: On the Possibility of Organisations' Emotional Duties. Political Studies 4 (66):813-829.1. IntroductionEmotional duties are regularly attributed to organisations. Here are some examples.In 2011, a media investigation exposed the abuse of patients at Winterbourne View hospital in England. Five years later, a parent of one of the patient..

Petersson, Björn (2020). Collective Guilt Feelings. In Saba Bazargan-Forward & Deborah Perron Tollefsen, Routledge Handbook of Collective Responsibility. Routledge. 16.1 IntroductionIn Complicity (2001), Christopher Kutz admits that there are important differences between assigning responsibility to a group in a holistic manner and summing up judgments about individual responsibility. He neverth..

Margaret Gilbert, Collective Guilt and Collective Guilt Feelings, The Journal of Ethics , 2002, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 115-1431. Introductioni. The Commonplace Nature of Holistic Talk about GroupsThus, though in the previous quotation Kutz acknowledges the ubiquity of ascriptions of accountability to groups, in the following he appears to express opposition to “treating [the group itself] as the cu..

Kutz, Christopher (2000). Complicity: Ethics and Law for a Collective Age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.There is an important difference between expressing recrimination at an organization and expressing it at an individual. Individuals who are the subjects of response respond affectively, ideally (from the perspective of the victims) with shame and guilt, perhaps with resentment. But a..

Kutz, Christopher (2000). Complicity: Ethics and Law for a Collective Age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kutz, Christopher (2000). Complicity: Ethics and Law for a Collective Age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 4.1 IntroductionWe turn now to the central issue: individual moral accountability in the context of collective action. The most important and far-reaching harms and wrongs of contemporary life are the products of collective actions, mediated by social and institutional structures. Th..

Kutz, Christopher (2000). Complicity: Ethics and Law for a Collective Age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 3.1 IntroductionTwo partners plan to rob a bank. The first recruits a driver while the second purchases a shotgun from a gun dealer. The driver knows he's taking part in a robbery, although not a bank robbery. The gun dealer should have checked his customer's police record before th..