소요의 철학 아카이브

Karbowski, Joseph (2015). Complexity and Progression in Aristotle’s Treatment of Endoxa in the Topics. Ancient Philosophy 35 (1):75-96. Traditionally, endoxa were thought to be objectively probable or subjectively plausible views, and the adjective ‘endoxos’ was translated accordingly. 1 More recently, however, scholars have suggested that endoxa are ‘reputable’ beliefs (Barnes 1981, 498-502), ‘..

McDowell, J. 1980. The role of eudaimonia in Aristotle’s Ethics. In Essays on Aristotle’s Ethics. Edited by A. O. Rorty, 359–376. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press. Argues that it is wrong to construe Aristotle’s account of happiness as an objectively rational account that is persuasive to any agent; rather, the article argues that Aristotle presupposes an audience whose proper upbringing miti..

Renon, Luis (1998). Aristotle's Endoxa and Plausible Argumentation. Argumentation 12 (1):95-113. 1. A LOOK AT THE FIELD: BACKGROUND AND PERSPECTIVES The Aristotelian dialectical field is, generally taken, that of argument with some other discursive agent (1) from accepted or acceptable propo sitions or premises, (2) through questions and answers, (3) on any debat able question. Aristotle’s diale..

Davia, Carlo (2017). Aristotle and the Endoxic Method. Journal of the History of Philosophy 55 (3):383-405.Standard Accounts(1) The passage specifies a discrete, three-step procedure: first set the phenomena before us; second, discuss the difficulties; third, resolve those difficulties so as to prove the truth of the most and most authoritative endoxa (“reputable opinions”).(2) By “set the pheno..

Barnes, Jonathan (1980). Aristotle and the methods of ethics. Revue Internationale de Philosophie 34 (3):490.2.In EN H 1 Aristotle speaks specifically of άχρασία ; but the method he sketches is meant to have a broader application ; for in the case of άχρασία we must proceed ώσπερ επί των άλλων. There can be no doubt that τά άλλα include other issues in practical philosophy : does the method exte..

Bolton, Robert (1990). The Epistemological Basis of Aristotelian Dialectic. In Daniel Devereux & Pierre Pellegrin, Biologie, Logique et Metaphysique Chez Aristote: Actes du Seminaire Cr.S.-N.S.F., 28 Juin-3 Juillet 1987. Paris: Editions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique. pp. 185-236. 1. CONFLICTING VIEWS OF DIALECTICIn recent accounts of the procedures which Aristotle recommends an..

Reeve, Cdc (2012). Aristotle's philosophical method. In Christopher Shields, The Oxford Handbook of Aristotle. Oxford University Press USA. pp. 150. 1. Dialectic, Eristic, and SophistryDialectical deductions differ from scientifc ones only in their premises: the latter are deductions from starting-points and hence are demonstrations (apodeixeis); the former are deductions from endoxa (Top. I 1 1..

Susan Stryker (2006). (De)Subjugated Knowledges An Introduction to Transgender Studies. Most broadly conceived, the fi eld of transgender studies is concerned with anything that disrupts, denaturalizes, rearticulates, and makes visible the normative linkages we generally assume to exist between the biological specifi city of the sexually diff erentiated human body, the social roles and sta tuses..

Hamlyn, D. W. (1990). Aristotle on Dialectic. Philosophy, 65(254), 465–476. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3751284 Owen him self was in part reacting to what I suppose is the traditional view of how Aristotle regarded dialectic, as revealed in Topics I. 1. On that view dialectic is for Aristotle a lesser way of proceeding than is demonstra tion, the method of science. For demonstration proceeds fro..

Frede, Dorothea (2012). The endoxon Mystique: What endoxa are and What They are Not. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 43:185-215.   1. The mystique In this article I hope to demystify the authority of the endoxa in Aristotle. This is not to deny that there is any basis for that author ity. But just as Betty Friedan’s ground-breaking work in the 1960s, The Feminine Mystique, did not intend to..