소요의 철학 아카이브

2024-2 Social Ontology 1. What do you take to be the strongest objections to the extended mind and to the social mind hypotheses?     I think both the extended mind and the socially extended mind are not free from the coupling-constitution fallacy, raised by Adams and Aizawa. According to them, Clark draws the conclusion that the object or process constitutes part of the agent’s cognitive appara..

2024-2 Social Ontology 1. Do you think that Gallagher’s analysis of cognition in dynamic terms as enactive processes and activities, commits one to adopt the socially extended mind? Criticizing the parity principle offered by Clark and Chalmers, Gallagher adopts an enactive approach to cognition to account for the extended mind. The parity principle states that if a part of the world functions a..

2024-2 Social Ontology 1. Clark and Chalmers argue in favor of active externalism about the mind. In their argument they rely on the analogy between Inga’s use of memory and Otto’s use of a notebook. Do you think that the analogy holds and that it helps their case?                           Clark and Chalmers defend active externalism, which holds that a coupled system formed by external links b..

2024-2 Social Ontology 1. In what way do Jenkins and Webster define the notion of marginalized functioning? Present examples to illustrate this concept and the distinction between marginalized functioning and marginalization.     To develop models of disability that unify the category without sidelining the body, Jenkins and Webster introduced the notion of marginalized functioning as follows:A ..

2024-2 Social Ontology 1. Howard and Aas present the Social Exclusion Model of disability. What are the main features of this model?     Howard and Aas present the Social Exclusion Model of disability, defined as follows:A person S is disabled in a context C, iff:(i) S is in some bodily or psychological state x [such that](ii) x is regularly assumed in the ideology in C to involve an impairment:..