소요의 철학 아카이브

2024-2 Social OntologyMason, Rebecca & Ritchie, Katherine (2020). Social Ontology. In Ricki Bliss & James Miller (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Metametaphysics. New York, NY: Routledge, 312-324. Traditionally, social entities have not fallen within the purview of mainstream metaphysics. [...] Here, in addition to surveying the field of social ontology, we consider whether the exclusion of soc..

Silva Jr, Paul (2023). Awareness and the Substructure of Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1. Towards an Awareness-First Epistemology1) The expression ‘aware of the fact that’ is a commonplace① criticize‘You were aware of the fact that it was wrong, but you did it anyway!’② excuse‘I’m sorry, I wasn’t aware of the fact that you would be hurt by my action.’③ admonish‘You should be aware ..

2024-1 Seminar Epistemology 1. Fumerton’s Inferential Internalism ① The distinction between inferential/non-inferential justification: in general, deduction, induction, and abduction (also known as “inference to the best explanation”) are enumerated as instances of inferential justification. Non-inferential justification, on the other hand, include a justification through sense perceptions, memo..

Richard Fumerton, "What the Internalist Should Say to the Tortoise," Episteme, 12, 2 (2015) 209–217. 1. Introduction① Carroll’s (1895) short piece “What the Tortoise said to Achilles” in many ways anticipates issues that arise in a number of contemporary controversies. One might argue, for example, that initially plausible attempts to deal with the problem of easy knowledge will land one in the ..

Cohen (2002) Basic Knowledge and the Problem of Easy Knowledge  1. Basic Knowledge and the KR PrincipleP1 We acquire knowledge of the world through belief sources like sense perception, memory, and induction.P2 Such sources can not deliver knowledge unless we know the source is reliable.P3 But surely our knowledge that sense perception is reliable will be based on knowledge we have about the wor..

2024-1 Seminar Epistemology Srinivasan’s Radical Externalism 1. What’s going on here? The Overall Picture of Radical Externalism In her paper, Srinivasan presents three epistemologically distinctive cases – ‘Racist Dinner Table,’ ‘Classist College,’ and ‘Domestic Violence’ – in which social hierarchies, discrimination, and power effects are subtly intertwined. She then argues that “externalism h..

Stewart Cohen, “Justification and Truth.” Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition, vol. 46, no. 3, 1984, pp. 279–95. 1. Introduction Epistemologists generally agree that two components of knowledge are justification and truth. If S believes that P, then S knows that P only if S is justiefied in believing that P and it is true that P. A central iss..

2023-2 Modal Logic (Segment 3) Q) Describe in some detail the different approaches to understanding possible worlds—e.g., out in Lycan’s discussion in “The Trouble with Possible Worlds”. What is the problem of how we know we are actual”? What are some main difficulties of and attempt at a combinatorial approach to possible worlds? What sense of “possible” seems more amenable to a combinatorial a..

미발표 원고 (2021.05) 게티어 문제의 새로운 해결 시도에 관한 비판적 고찰 -‘수정된 거짓믿음배제 접근방식’에 대한 분석을 중심으로- 【주제분류】분석철학, 인식론 【주 요 어】게티어 문제, 거짓믿음배제 접근방식, 거짓 근거, 성향적 믿음 【요 약 문】 앎의 전통적인 분석이 지닌 결함을 지적했던 게티어의 영향력 있는 논문 이래로, 많은 철학자들은 다양한 방식으로 기존의 조건들을 수정하려 시도해 왔다. 그러나 오늘날 ‘거짓믿음배제 접근방식(SANC)’을 포함한 어떠한 해결책도 결정적으로 유효한 것으로는 여겨지지 않는 실정이다. 최근, 김기현과 김도식은 ‘수정된 거짓믿음배제 접근방식(RSANC)’을 제안함으로써 이러한 교착 상태를 타개하려 시도한다. 이 논문에서, 우리는 일반적으로 앎으로 간주될 수 있..

2015-1 인식론 정리 인식적 정당성에 대한 이론들 1. 인식적 정당성에 대한 배경설명 K) 어떤 사람 S가 명제 P를 알기 위한 필요충분조건(IFF)는 1) P가 참이고 2) S가 P를 믿으며, 3) P에 대한 S의 믿음이 인식적으로 정당하다.(=S가 P를 믿는 것에 인식적 정당성을 지닌다.) 게티어 반례에 대한 해결시도가 계속해서 실패로 돌아가면서, 인식론자들은 그들이 이 문제를 해결하지 못하는 이유가 인식적 정당성에 대한 이해가 부족하기 때문은 아닌가라는 생각을 갖게 되었다. 이에 따라 인식적 정당성에 대한 여러 이론들이 등장함. 인식적 정당성: 어떤 조건을 만족시켰을 때 명제에 대한 한 사람의 믿음이 정당화 되는가? 우리가 갖고 있는 믿음 중에는 근거 있는 믿음도, 인식적으로 비합리적인 믿음도 ..